The American Vote
Progressive EraCycle 32 / 60

1912

A split party changes the map.
Woodrow Wilson (Democratic) defeated Theodore Roosevelt (Progressive), 41.8% to 27.4% of the popular vote.

The 1912 U.S. presidential election was won by Woodrow Wilson (Democratic) with 435 of 531 electoral votes, defeating Theodore Roosevelt (Progressive). Electoral-vote margin: 347 (435 to 88). Popular-vote margin: 14.4 percentage points. Turnout was 59.0%. The cycle falls in the Progressive Era of American electoral history.

Wilson
435 EV
Roosevelt
88 EV
Other
8 EV
0266 to win531
The map · 1912
40 states for Dem · 6 for Prog
ALAKAZARCACOFLGAIDILINIAKSKYLAMEMIMNMSMOMTNENVNMNYNCNDOHOKORPASCSDTNTXUTVAWAWVWIWY

Open the what-if calculator → — flip states and re-count. A toy, not history.

Narrative

A split party changes the map

Democrat Woodrow Wilson won in a landslide as Roosevelt's 'Bull Moose' Progressive Party split the Republican vote with incumbent Taft. Roosevelt, dissatisfied with Taft's conservatism, launched an independent campaign after losing the Republican nomination, finishing second in both popular and electoral votes — the best third-party performance in US history. Wilson won only 41.8% of the popular vote but carried 40 states. Eugene Debs, running as a Socialist, won 6% of the vote.

Key issue

Progressive reform; trust-busting; tariff; Republican Party civil war

Notable

Roosevelt's 27.4% and 88 EV remain the best third-party performance in U.S. history

This summary was drafted with AI tools and has not yet been checked sentence by sentence. The vote table and the National Archives note on this page come from named sources; where they differ from the summary, rely on them. Tell us about an error.

From the National Archives

Republican Party candidate Taft, and Vice Presidential running mate James S. Sherman, received 8 electoral votes each, but Sherman died just before the election. After the election, before the meeting of the electors, Nicholas Butler was selected to receive the electoral votes from Utah and Vermont that would have gone to Sherman.

National Archives, Electoral College results for 1912, archives.gov, read October 3, 2026. Quoted as published.

States · 48 reporting

State results · 1912

Popular vote by state, with each state's electoral votes.
Closest states
  1. California Roosevelt by 174 · 0.03 pts
  2. Idaho Wilson by 1,111 · 1.1 pts
  3. Illinois Wilson by 18,570 · 1.6 pts
  4. Wyoming Wilson by 750 · 1.8 pts
  5. Vermont Taft by 1,235 · 2.0 pts
Tipping point

New YorkWilson won it by 12.6 points; its electoral votes took the total to 277, past the 266 needed.

Line up the states the winner carried from widest margin to narrowest and add up their electoral votes: the tipping point is the state that takes the total past a majority.

Scroll the table sideways for every column.

1912 presidential election results by state: popular vote, margin and electoral votes
StateElectoral votes
Woodrow Wilson
Dem
Theodore Roosevelt
Prog
William Howard Taft
Rep
Eugene V. Debs
Soc
Also namedMarginLeader
Alabama
12 EV
82,439
69.9%
22,689
19.2%
9,731
8.3%
3,029
2.6%
None
59,750
50.7 pts
Wilson Dem
Arizona
3 EV
10,324
43.5%
6,949
29.3%
3,021
12.7%
3,163
13.3%
Eugene W. Chafin 265 · 1.1%
3,375
14.2 pts
Wilson Dem
Arkansas
9 EV
68,838
55.6%
21,673
17.5%
24,297
19.6%
8,153
6.6%
None
44,541
36.0 pts
Wilson Dem
California1
13 EV
Roosevelt 11, Wilson 2
283,4361
42.1%
283,6101
42.1%
Not named
79,2011
11.8%
Eugene W. Chafin 23,366 · 3.5%1
174
0.03 pts
Roosevelt Prog
Colorado
6 EV
114,223
42.8%
72,306
27.1%
58,386
21.9%
16,418
6.2%
Eugene W. Chafin 5,063 · 1.9%
41,917
15.7 pts
Wilson Dem
Connecticut
7 EV
74,561
39.2%
34,129
17.9%
68,324
35.9%
10,056
5.3%
Eugene W. Chafin 2,068 · 1.1%
6,237
3.3 pts
Wilson Dem
Delaware
3 EV
22,631
46.5%
8,886
18.2%
15,998
32.9%
556
1.1%
Eugene W. Chafin 623 · 1.3%
6,633
13.6 pts
Wilson Dem
Florida
6 EV
36,417
70.2%
4,535
8.7%
4,279
8.2%
4,806
9.3%
Eugene W. Chafin 1,854 · 3.6%
31,611
60.9 pts
Wilson Dem
Georgia2
14 EV
93,1712
76.7%
22,0102
18.1%
5,1902
4.3%
Not namedNone
71,161
58.6 pts
Wilson Dem
Idaho
4 EV
33,921
32.1%
25,527
24.1%
32,810
31.0%
11,960
11.3%
Eugene W. Chafin 1,537 · 1.5%
1,111
1.1 pts
Wilson Dem
Illinois3
29 EV
405,0483
35.3%
386,4783
33.7%
253,6133
22.1%
81,2783
7.1%
Eugene W. Chafin 15,710 · 1.4%3
18,570
1.6 pts
Wilson Dem
Indiana
15 EV
281,890
43.1%
162,007
24.8%
151,267
23.1%
36,931
5.6%
Eugene W. Chafin 19,249 · 2.9%
119,883
18.3 pts
Wilson Dem
Iowa4
13 EV
185,3254
37.6%
161,8194
32.9%
119,8054
24.3%
16,9674
3.4%
Eugene W. Chafin 8,440 · 1.7%4
23,506
4.8 pts
Wilson Dem
Kansas
10 EV
143,670
39.3%
120,123
32.9%
74,844
20.5%
26,807
7.3%
None
23,547
6.4 pts
Wilson Dem
Kentucky
13 EV
219,584
48.4%
102,766
22.7%
115,512
25.5%
11,647
2.6%
None
104,072
22.9 pts
Wilson Dem
Louisiana
10 EV
60,966
76.8%
9,323
11.7%
3,834
4.8%
5,249
6.6%
None
51,643
65.1 pts
Wilson Dem
Maine
6 EV
51,113
39.4%
48,493
37.4%
26,545
20.5%
2,541
2.0%
None
2,620
2.0 pts
Wilson Dem
Maryland
8 EV
112,674
48.6%
57,786
24.9%
54,956
23.7%
3,996
1.7%
None
54,888
23.7 pts
Wilson Dem
Massachusetts
18 EV
173,408
35.5%
142,228
29.1%
155,948
32.0%
12,616
2.6%
None
17,460
3.6 pts
Wilson Dem
Michigan5
15 EV
150,7515
27.4%
214,5845
38.9%
152,2445
27.6%
23,2115
4.2%
Eugene W. Chafin 8,934 · 1.6%5
62,340
11.3 pts
Roosevelt Prog
Minnesota
12 EV
106,426
31.8%
125,856
37.7%
64,334
19.2%
27,505
8.2%
Eugene W. Chafin 7,886 · 2.4%
19,430
5.8 pts
Roosevelt Prog
Mississippi
10 EV
57,164
88.9%
3,627
5.6%
1,511
2.3%
2,017
3.1%
None
53,537
83.2 pts
Wilson Dem
Missouri
18 EV
330,746
47.3%
124,371
17.8%
207,821
29.7%
28,466
4.1%
None
122,925
17.6 pts
Wilson Dem
Montana6
4 EV
27,9416
35.0%
22,4566
28.1%
18,5126
23.2%
10,8856
13.6%
None
5,485
6.9 pts
Wilson Dem
Nebraska
8 EV
109,008
43.7%
72,689
29.1%
54,216
21.7%
10,185
4.1%
Eugene W. Chafin 3,383 · 1.4%
36,319
14.6 pts
Wilson Dem
Nevada
3 EV
7,986
39.7%
5,620
27.9%
3,196
15.9%
3,313
16.5%
None
2,366
11.8 pts
Wilson Dem
New Hampshire
4 EV
34,724
39.5%
17,794
20.2%
32,927
37.4%
1,981
2.3%
None
1,797
2.0 pts
Wilson Dem
New Jersey
14 EV
178,289
41.2%
145,410
33.6%
88,835
20.5%
15,801
3.7%
None
32,879
7.6 pts
Wilson Dem
New Mexico
3 EV
20,437
41.4%
8,347
16.9%
17,733
35.9%
2,859
5.8%
None
2,704
5.5 pts
Wilson Dem
New York
45 EV
655,475
41.3%
390,021
24.6%
455,428
28.7%
63,381
4.0%
Eugene W. Chafin 19,427 · 1.2%
200,047
12.6 pts
Wilson Dem
North Carolina
12 EV
144,507
59.2%
69,130
28.3%
29,139
11.9%
Not namedNone
75,377
30.9 pts
Wilson Dem
North Dakota
5 EV
29,555
34.1%
25,726
29.7%
23,090
26.7%
6,966
8.0%
Eugene W. Chafin 1,243 · 1.4%
3,829
4.4 pts
Wilson Dem
Ohio
24 EV
423,152
40.9%
229,327
22.2%
277,066
26.8%
89,930
8.7%
Eugene W. Chafin 11,459 · 1.1%
146,086
14.1 pts
Wilson Dem
Oklahoma7
10 EV
119,1567
46.8%
Not named
90,7867
35.7%
42,2627
16.6%
None
28,370
11.2 pts
Wilson Dem
Oregon
5 EV
47,064
34.3%
37,600
27.4%
34,673
25.3%
13,343
9.7%
Eugene W. Chafin 4,360 · 3.2%
9,464
6.9 pts
Wilson Dem
Pennsylvania8
38 EV
395,6198
32.4%
447,4268
36.7%
273,3058
22.4%
83,1648
6.8%
Eugene W. Chafin 19,533 · 1.6%8
51,807
4.2 pts
Roosevelt Prog
Rhode Island9
5 EV
30,1429
38.7%
16,8789
21.7%
27,7039
35.6%
2,0499
2.6%
None
2,439
3.1 pts
Wilson Dem
South Carolina
9 EV
48,355
96.0%
1,293
2.6%
536
1.1%
Not namedNone
47,062
93.5 pts
Wilson Dem
South Dakota10
5 EV
48,94210
42.1%
58,81110
50.6%
Not named
4,66210
4.0%
Eugene W. Chafin 3,910 · 3.4%10
9,869
8.5 pts
Roosevelt Prog
Tennessee
12 EV
130,335
52.6%
53,725
21.7%
59,444
24.0%
3,492
1.4%
None
70,891
28.6 pts
Wilson Dem
Texas
20 EV
221,589
72.6%
26,755
8.8%
28,853
9.5%
25,743
8.4%
None
192,736
63.2 pts
Wilson Dem
Utah
4 EV
36,579
32.5%
24,174
21.5%
42,100
37.5%
9,023
8.0%
None
5,521
4.9 pts
Taft Rep
Vermont
4 EV
15,350
24.4%
22,070
35.1%
23,305
37.1%
928
1.5%
Eugene W. Chafin 1,154 · 1.8%
1,235
2.0 pts
Taft Rep
Virginia
12 EV
90,332
65.9%
21,777
15.9%
23,288
17.0%
Not namedNone
67,044
48.9 pts
Wilson Dem
Washington
7 EV
86,840
26.9%
113,698
35.2%
70,445
21.8%
40,134
12.4%
Eugene W. Chafin 9,810 · 3.0%
26,858
8.3 pts
Roosevelt Prog
West Virginia
8 EV
113,197
42.1%
79,112
29.4%
56,754
21.1%
15,248
5.7%
Eugene W. Chafin 4,517 · 1.7%
34,085
12.7 pts
Wilson Dem
Wisconsin
13 EV
164,409
41.4%
58,661
14.8%
130,878
32.9%
34,168
8.6%
Eugene W. Chafin 8,467 · 2.1%
33,531
8.4 pts
Wilson Dem
Wyoming
3 EV
15,310
36.2%
9,232
21.8%
14,560
34.4%
2,760
6.5%
Eugene W. Chafin 434 · 1.0%
750
1.8 pts
Wilson Dem

Shares are of each state’s total vote for president. “Not named”: the figures do not give that candidate a line of their own in that state — for example under 1% of the vote, not on the ballot there, or counted on an unnamed line (see the state’s note). Margin is the leader’s lead over the second-placed candidate.

Notes on the figures

  1. California Roosevelt's Progressives held the Republican line in California; Taft was not on the ballot, and his figure is write-in votes.
  2. Georgia The official table's state total (121,533) is 1 more than the tickets it lists; the difference is counted under other candidates.
  3. Illinois The official table prints a state total of 1,146,103, which does not agree with its own figures (they add up to 1,146,193); their sum is used.
  4. Iowa The official table prints a state total of 492,326, which does not agree with its own figures (they add up to 492,356); their sum is used.
  5. Michigan The official table prints a state total of 550,776, which does not agree with its own figures (they add up to 550,976); their sum is used.
  6. Montana The official table's state total (79,910) is 84 more than the tickets it lists; the difference is counted under other candidates.
  7. Oklahoma Roosevelt had no electors on the Oklahoma ballot.
  8. Pennsylvania The official table's state total (1,220,201) is 450 more than the tickets it lists; the difference is counted under other candidates.
  9. Rhode Island The official table's state total (77,894) is 270 more than the tickets it lists; the difference is counted under other candidates.
  10. South Dakota Roosevelt's Progressives held the Republican line in South Dakota; Taft was not on the ballot.

SourceThe World Almanac and Encyclopedia 1914 (Public domain in the United States: published before 1931, retrieved 2026-10-03). How these figures were compiled