1900
The 1900 U.S. presidential election was won by William McKinley (Republican) with 292 of 447 electoral votes, defeating William Jennings Bryan (Democratic). Electoral-vote margin: 137 (292 to 155). Popular-vote margin: 6.1 percentage points. Turnout was 73.7%. The cycle falls in the Progressive Era of American electoral history.
Open the what-if calculator → — flip states and re-count. A toy, not history.
William McKinley and the 1900 map
McKinley won re-election in a rematch against Bryan, running on prosperity and 'the full dinner pail.' The Spanish-American War of 1898 had made America a colonial power, and Bryan campaigned against imperialism in the Philippines. Theodore Roosevelt was selected as McKinley's running mate to sideline the reform-minded New York governor. McKinley's victory was decisive, but he was assassinated in September 1901, elevating the 42-year-old Roosevelt to the presidency.
Imperialism and the Philippine-American War; prosperity and the gold standard
McKinley assassinated in 1901, making Theodore Roosevelt — at 42 — the youngest president
This summary was drafted with AI tools and has not yet been checked sentence by sentence. The vote table and the National Archives note on this page come from named sources; where they differ from the summary, rely on them. Tell us about an error.
William McKinley was shot September 6, 1901 and died September 14, 1901. He was succeeded by Theodore Roosevelt.
National Archives, Electoral College results for 1900, archives.gov, read October 3, 2026. Quoted as published.
States · 45 reporting
State results · 1900
IllinoisMcKinley won it by 8.4 points; its electoral votes took the total to 225, past the 224 needed.
Line up the states the winner carried from widest margin to narrowest and add up their electoral votes: the tipping point is the state that takes the total past a majority.
Scroll the table sideways for every column.
| State | Electoral votes | William McKinley Rep | William Jennings Bryan Dem | John G. Woolley Proh | Also named | Margin | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 11 EV | 55,512 34.8% | 97,131 60.9% | 2,762 1.7% | Wharton Barker 4,178 · 2.6% | 41,619 26.1 pts | Bryan Dem |
| Arkansas | 8 EV | 44,800 35.0% | 81,142 63.5% | Not named | None | 36,342 28.4 pts | Bryan Dem |
| California1 | 9 EV | 164,7551 54.2% | 124,9851 41.1% | 5,0241 1.7% | Eugene V. Debs 7,554 · 2.5%1 | 39,770 13.1 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Colorado | 4 EV | 93,072 42.1% | 122,733 55.5% | 3,790 1.7% | None | 29,661 13.4 pts | Bryan Dem |
| Connecticut | 6 EV | 102,567 56.9% | 73,997 41.1% | Not named | None | 28,570 15.9 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Delaware | 3 EV | 22,529 53.7% | 18,858 44.9% | 538 1.3% | None | 3,671 8.7 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Florida | 4 EV | 7,314 19.2% | 28,007 73.6% | 1,039 2.7% | Wharton Barker 1,070 · 2.8% Eugene V. Debs 601 · 1.6% | 20,693 54.4 pts | Bryan Dem |
| Georgia | 13 EV | 35,035 28.5% | 81,700 66.6% | 1,396 1.1% | Wharton Barker 4,584 · 3.7% | 46,665 38.0 pts | Bryan Dem |
| Idaho | 3 EV | 27,198 47.0% | 29,646 51.2% | 857 1.5% | None | 2,448 4.2 pts | Bryan Dem |
| Illinois | 24 EV | 597,985 52.8% | 503,061 44.4% | 17,626 1.6% | None | 94,924 8.4 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Indiana | 15 EV | 336,063 50.6% | 309,584 46.6% | 13,718 2.1% | None | 26,479 4.0 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Iowa | 13 EV | 307,818 58.1% | 209,466 39.5% | 9,502 1.8% | None | 98,352 18.6 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Kansas | 10 EV | 185,955 52.6% | 162,601 46.0% | 3,605 1.0% | None | 23,354 6.6 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Kentucky2 | 13 EV | 227,1282 48.4% | 235,1032 50.1% | Not named | None | 7,975 1.7 pts | Bryan Dem |
| Louisiana3 | 8 EV | 14,2333 20.4% | 53,6713 76.8% | Not named | None | 39,438 56.4 pts | Bryan Dem |
| Maine | 6 EV | 65,435 61.9% | 36,822 34.8% | 2,585 2.4% | None | 28,613 27.1 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Maryland | 8 EV | 136,212 51.5% | 122,271 46.2% | 4,582 1.7% | None | 13,941 5.3 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Massachusetts4 | 15 EV | 238,8664 57.7% | 156,9994 37.9% | 6,2024 1.5% | Eugene V. Debs 9,607 · 2.3%4 | 81,867 19.8 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Michigan | 14 EV | 316,269 58.1% | 211,685 38.9% | 11,859 2.2% | None | 104,584 19.2 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Minnesota | 9 EV | 188,915 60.3% | 111,409 35.6% | 8,467 2.7% | None | 77,506 24.8 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Mississippi5 | 9 EV | 5,7535 9.7% | 51,7065 87.4% | Not named | Wharton Barker 1,644 · 2.8%5 | 45,953 77.7 pts | Bryan Dem |
| Missouri6 | 17 EV | 314,0916 45.9% | 351,9126 51.5% | Not named | None | 37,821 5.5 pts | Bryan Dem |
| Montana7 | 3 EV | 25,3737 39.9% | 37,1467 58.4% | Not named | Eugene V. Debs 708 · 1.1%7 | 11,773 18.5 pts | Bryan Dem |
| Nebraska8 | 8 EV | 121,8358 50.5% | 114,0138 47.2% | 3,6558 1.5% | None | 7,822 3.2 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Nevada | 3 EV | 3,860 37.7% | 6,376 62.3% | Not named | None | 2,516 24.6 pts | Bryan Dem |
| New Hampshire | 4 EV | 54,803 59.3% | 35,489 38.4% | 1,270 1.4% | None | 19,314 20.9 pts | McKinley Rep |
| New Jersey | 10 EV | 221,707 55.3% | 164,808 41.1% | 7,183 1.8% | Eugene V. Debs 4,609 · 1.1% | 56,899 14.2 pts | McKinley Rep |
| New York | 36 EV | 821,992 53.1% | 678,386 43.8% | 22,043 1.4% | None | 143,606 9.3 pts | McKinley Rep |
| North Carolina | 11 EV | 133,081 45.5% | 157,752 53.9% | Not named | None | 24,671 8.4 pts | Bryan Dem |
| North Dakota | 3 EV | 35,891 62.1% | 20,519 35.5% | 731 1.3% | None | 15,372 26.6 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Ohio | 23 EV | 543,918 52.3% | 474,882 45.7% | Not named | None | 69,036 6.6 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Oregon | 4 EV | 46,526 55.3% | 33,385 39.7% | 2,536 3.0% | Eugene V. Debs 1,466 · 1.7% | 13,141 15.6 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Pennsylvania | 32 EV | 712,665 60.7% | 424,232 36.2% | 27,908 2.4% | None | 288,433 24.6 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Rhode Island9 | 4 EV | 33,7849 59.7% | 19,8129 35.0% | 1,5299 2.7% | Joseph F. Malloney 1,423 · 2.5%9 | 13,972 24.7 pts | McKinley Rep |
| South Carolina | 9 EV | 3,579 7.0% | 47,236 93.0% | Not named | None | 43,657 85.9 pts | Bryan Dem |
| South Dakota | 4 EV | 54,530 56.7% | 39,544 41.1% | 1,542 1.6% | None | 14,986 15.6 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Tennessee | 12 EV | 121,194 44.6% | 144,751 53.3% | 3,900 1.4% | None | 23,557 8.7 pts | Bryan Dem |
| Texas10 | 15 EV | 121,17310 29.4% | 267,33710 64.8% | Not named | Wharton Barker 20,976 · 5.1%10 | 146,164 35.5 pts | Bryan Dem |
| Utah11 | 3 EV | 47,13911 50.6% | 45,00611 48.3% | Not named | None | 2,133 2.3 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Vermont12 | 4 EV | 42,56812 75.7% | 12,84912 22.9% | Not named | None | 29,719 52.9 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Virginia | 12 EV | 115,865 43.9% | 146,080 55.3% | Not named | None | 30,215 11.4 pts | Bryan Dem |
| Washington | 4 EV | 57,456 53.4% | 44,833 41.7% | 2,363 2.2% | Eugene V. Debs 2,006 · 1.9% | 12,623 11.7 pts | McKinley Rep |
| West Virginia13 | 6 EV | 119,85113 54.3% | 98,79113 44.7% | Not named | None | 21,060 9.5 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Wisconsin | 12 EV | 265,866 60.0% | 159,285 36.0% | 10,124 2.3% | Joseph F. Malloney 7,095 · 1.6% | 106,581 24.1 pts | McKinley Rep |
| Wyoming | 3 EV | 14,517 58.5% | 10,298 41.5% | Not named | None | 4,219 17.0 pts | McKinley Rep |
Shares are of each state’s total vote for president. “Not named”: the figures do not give that candidate a line of their own in that state — for example under 1% of the vote, not on the ballot there, or counted on an unnamed line (see the state’s note). Margin is the leader’s lead over the second-placed candidate.
Notes on the figures
- California The official table's state total (303,793) is 1,475 more than the tickets it lists; the difference is counted under other candidates.
- Kentucky The official table prints a state total of 468,888, which does not agree with its own figures (they add up to 468,908); their sum is used.
- Louisiana The official table's state total (69,904) is 2,000 more than the tickets it lists; the difference is counted under other candidates.
- Massachusetts The official table prints a state total of 414,266, which does not agree with its own figures (they add up to 414,273); their sum is used.
- Mississippi The official table's state total (59,150) is 47 more than the tickets it lists; the difference is counted under other candidates.
- Missouri The official table prints a state total of 683,534, which does not agree with its own figures (they add up to 683,634); their sum is used.
- Montana The official table's state total (63,641) is 116 more than the tickets it lists; the difference is counted under other candidates.
- Nebraska The official table's state total (241,433) is 3 more than the tickets it lists; the difference is counted under other candidates.
- Rhode Island The official table's state total (56,568) is 20 more than the tickets it lists; the difference is counted under other candidates.
- Texas The official table's state total (412,290) is 159 more than the tickets it lists; the difference is counted under other candidates.
- Utah The official table's state total (93,180) is 1,035 more than the tickets it lists; the difference is counted under other candidates.
- Vermont The official table's state total (56,216) is 64 more than the tickets it lists; the difference is counted under other candidates.
- West Virginia The official table's state total (220,788) is 1 more than the tickets it lists; the difference is counted under other candidates.
SourceThe World Almanac and Encyclopedia 1901 . How these figures were compiled
Classroom
All 300 packets, free
60 cycles · K-2 through AP · open download.
Browse packets →Read further
Curated picksThe Bully Pulpit
Doris Kearns Goodwin
TR, Taft, and the muckraking press.
Buy on Amazon →Wilson
A. Scott Berg
Definitive single-volume biography.
Buy on Amazon →Recommendations are editorial.
Free, ad-light, no paywall
Built by one person. Tips fund the next 60 elections of editorial.